Field Scale Variable Rate Trials,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Resolution Trials, 3-Point Trials, 2004, 2005 |
3-Point Wheat Trials 2005
Table 1. Grain yield and nitrogen fertilizer applied for 2005 Wheat 3pt
trial in EFAW, Lake Carl Blackwell and Tipton, OK.
Trt |
Preplant N |
Topdress N* |
Total N
Applied, lb ac-1 |
Grain
Yield, bu ac-1 |
|
lb ac-1 |
|
EFAW |
LCB |
Tipton |
EFAW |
LCB |
Tipton |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
42 |
14 |
2 |
120 |
0 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
35 |
58 |
45 |
3 |
0 |
NFOA |
26 |
28 |
24 |
32 |
43 |
21 |
4 |
45 |
NFOA |
53 |
61 |
64 |
34 |
54 |
32 |
5 |
0 |
SBNRC |
40 |
58 |
40 |
33 |
49 |
27 |
6 |
45 |
SBNRC |
60 |
80 |
85 |
35 |
57 |
40 |
7 |
45 |
45 |
101 |
87 |
- |
36 |
56 |
- |
8 |
90 |
0 |
90 |
90 |
- |
35 |
59 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* UAN – 28% N |
Table 2. N Fertilizer, grain yield and profit for
Wheat 3 pt trial in EFAW, LCB and Tipton.
|
|
EFAW |
LCB |
Tipton |
Trt |
Preplant |
Topdress |
Yield |
Profit |
Topdress |
Yield |
Profit |
Topdress |
Yield |
Profit |
|
lb ac-1 |
lb ac-1 |
bu ac-1 |
$ |
lb ac-1 |
bu ac-1 |
$ |
lb ac-1 |
bu ac-1 |
$ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
96 |
0 |
42 |
147 |
0 |
14 |
48 |
2 |
120 |
0 |
35 |
87 |
0 |
58 |
165 |
0 |
45 |
123 |
3 |
0 |
26 |
32 |
102 |
28 |
43 |
142 |
24 |
21 |
65 |
4 |
45 |
8 |
34 |
103 |
16 |
54 |
171 |
19 |
32 |
90 |
5 |
0 |
40 |
33 |
102 |
58 |
49 |
153 |
40 |
27 |
82 |
6 |
45 |
15 |
35 |
104 |
35 |
57 |
175 |
40 |
40 |
113 |
7 |
45 |
56 |
36 |
93 |
42 |
56 |
167 |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
90 |
0 |
35 |
94 |
0 |
59 |
180 |
- |
- |
- |
preplant N price lb-1 : $ 0.30
topdress N price lb-1 : $ 0.35
price of wheat bu-1 : $ 3.50
|
2005 OFIT
Table 1. N fertilizer applied for Wheat OFIT 2005 across sites, OK.
Trt |
Preplant N |
Topdress |
Topdress N Applied, lb ac-1 |
|
lb ac-1 |
lb ac-1 |
Altus |
Covington |
Hennessey |
Lahoma |
LCB |
Perkins |
Tipton |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Flat |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
3 |
0 |
Flat |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
4 |
45 |
Flat |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
5 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
90 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
NFOA-CV |
46 |
34 |
86 |
34 |
15 |
12 |
35 |
8 |
45 |
NFOA-CV |
20 |
17 |
44 |
18 |
8 |
4 |
29 |
9 |
0 |
SBNRC |
32 |
24 |
77 |
0 |
9 |
22 |
37 |
10 |
45 |
SBNRC |
2 |
9 |
26 |
34 |
11 |
13 |
29 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
MY-NFOA |
51 |
33 |
125 |
33 |
28 |
26 |
56 |
13 |
45 |
MY-NFOA |
18 |
27 |
21 |
27 |
12 |
21 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Grain Yield for Wheat OFIT 2005 across
sites, OK.
Trt |
Preplant N |
Topdress |
Grain
Yield, bu ac-1 |
|
lb ac-1 |
lb ac-1 |
Altus |
Covington |
Hennessey |
Lahoma |
LCB |
Perkins |
Tipton |
1 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
13 |
43 |
23 |
40 |
28 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
Flat (45) |
35 |
20 |
50 |
39 |
42 |
30 |
26 |
3 |
0 |
Flat (90) |
31 |
24 |
53 |
49 |
48 |
35 |
38 |
4 |
45 |
Flat (45) |
28 |
21 |
55 |
53 |
43 |
31 |
37 |
5 |
45 |
0 |
29 |
18 |
53 |
30 |
44 |
32 |
24 |
6 |
90 |
0 |
29 |
19 |
51 |
46 |
44 |
35 |
27 |
7 |
0 |
NFOA-CV |
33 |
19 |
50 |
37 |
41 |
30 |
28 |
8 |
45 |
NFOA-CV |
31 |
19 |
56 |
45 |
41 |
33 |
35 |
9 |
0 |
SBNRC |
32 |
16 |
54 |
37 |
42 |
33 |
25 |
10 |
45 |
SBNRC |
30 |
18 |
54 |
49 |
41 |
33 |
34 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
12 |
47 |
26 |
41 |
27 |
18 |
12 |
0 |
MY-NFOA |
34 |
19 |
51 |
43 |
44 |
32 |
31 |
13 |
45 |
MY-NFOA |
29 |
22 |
52 |
51 |
43 |
29 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average CV |
5% |
20% |
13% |
20% |
11% |
16% |
17% |
CV range |
3-8% |
15-28% |
7-24% |
14-26% |
7-18% |
10-22% |
10-23% |
Average RINDVI |
1.14 |
1.33 |
1.46 |
1.95 |
1.23 |
1.24 |
1.78 |
Table 3. Profit earned for Wheat OFIT 2005 across
sites, OK.
Trt |
Preplant
N |
Topdress |
Profit, $ ac-1 |
|
lb ac-1 |
lb ac-1 |
Altus |
Covington |
Hennessey |
Lahoma |
LCB |
Perkins |
Tipton |
1 |
0 |
0 |
106 |
45 |
151 |
79 |
140 |
98 |
53 |
2 |
0 |
Flat |
105 |
55 |
158 |
121 |
131 |
90 |
77 |
3 |
0 |
Flat |
78 |
51 |
155 |
142 |
135 |
91 |
102 |
4 |
45 |
Flat |
70 |
44 |
162 |
155 |
120 |
81 |
102 |
5 |
45 |
0 |
88 |
51 |
173 |
92 |
142 |
98 |
69 |
6 |
90 |
0 |
75 |
40 |
153 |
134 |
127 |
96 |
68 |
7 |
0 |
NFOA-CV |
98 |
53 |
145 |
116 |
138 |
101 |
86 |
8 |
45 |
NFOA-CV |
88 |
46 |
167 |
139 |
129 |
99 |
100 |
9 |
0 |
SBNRC |
102 |
48 |
162 |
131 |
143 |
107 |
75 |
10 |
45 |
SBNRC |
90 |
48 |
166 |
146 |
127 |
99 |
96 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
112 |
42 |
166 |
91 |
145 |
99 |
63 |
12 |
0 |
MY-NFOA |
100 |
54 |
134 |
138 |
145 |
103 |
87 |
13 |
45 |
MY-NFOA |
83 |
53 |
161 |
155 |
132 |
102 |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Point Wheat Trials, 2004 |
Method of Application
and Resolution Tipton, OK 2004
|
Treatment
|
PrePlant N
|
Topdress N
|
Grain Yield
|
N Use Efficiency
|
|
lb/ac
|
lb/ac
|
bu/ac
|
%
|
Check
|
0
|
0
|
50.5
|
---
|
Fixed Rate 1
|
90
|
0
|
69.8
|
30
|
Fixed Rate 2
|
0
|
90
|
70.3
|
31
|
Var. Rate 3 x3 ft
|
0
|
30
|
63.5
|
60
|
Var. Rate 6 x 12 ft
|
0
|
33
|
63.5
|
55
|
Var. Rate 12 x 24
|
0
|
31
|
60.9
|
47
|
Average check sensor CV
= 17.2% with Average NDVI = 0.61 at Feekes 5
|
|
Method of Application
and Resolution Chickasha, OK - 2004
|
Treatment
|
PrePlant N
|
Topdress N
|
Grain Yield
|
N Use Efficiency
|
|
lb/ac
|
lb/ac
|
bu/ac
|
%
|
Check
|
0
|
0
|
18.1
|
---
|
Fixed Rate 1
|
90
|
0
|
25.2
|
11
|
Fixed Rate 2
|
0
|
90
|
26.5
|
13
|
Var. Rate 3 x3 ft
|
0
|
30
|
24.2
|
24
|
Var. Rate 6 x 12 ft
|
0
|
33
|
25.4
|
23
|
Var. Rate 12 x 24
|
0
|
31
|
26.0
|
27
|
Average check sensor CV
= 12.1% with Average NDVI = 0.28 at Feekes 5
|
|
GreenSeekerTM vs
Conventional Treatments Lake Carl Blackwell, Stillwater, OK 2004
|
Treatment
|
Preplant N Rate
|
Topdress
N Rate
|
Total N Applied
|
Wheat Yield
|
NUE
|
Gross Rev.
|
Add. Return
|
|
Lb/ac
|
Bu/ac
|
%
|
$/ac
|
Check
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
31.3
|
----
|
109.00
|
|
All N Pre
|
120
|
0
|
120
|
40.4
|
11
|
111.00
|
|
Var NFOA
|
0
|
22
|
22
|
40.8
|
60
|
137.00
|
24.00
|
Var. NFOA
|
45
|
8
|
53
|
40.1
|
23
|
127.00
|
|
Flat NFOA
|
0
|
30
|
30
|
38.5
|
34
|
127.00
|
|
Flat NFOA
|
45
|
14
|
59
|
40.5
|
22
|
127.00
|
|
NFOA – OSU Nitrogen
Fertilizer Optimization Alogrithm
|
Sensor CV at F5 = 16,
NDVI = 0.4
|
Revenue computed with
wheat priced at $3.50/bu
|
|
GreenSeekerTM vs
Conventional Treatments Chickasha, OK 2004
|
Treatment
|
Preplant N Rate
|
Topdress
N Rate
|
Total N Applied
|
Wheat Yield
|
NUE
|
Gross Rev.
|
Add. Return
|
|
Lb/ac
|
Bu/ac
|
%
|
$/ac
|
Check
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
22.5
|
----
|
79.00
|
|
All N Pre
|
120
|
0
|
120
|
34.7
|
20
|
107.00
|
|
Var NFOA
|
0
|
24
|
24
|
32.0
|
57
|
106.00
|
|
Var NFOA
|
45
|
11
|
55
|
35.4
|
32
|
110.00
|
|
Flat NFOA
|
0
|
26
|
26
|
27.6
|
28
|
90.00
|
|
Flat NFOA
|
45
|
12
|
57
|
39.4
|
42
|
123.00
|
16.00
|
NFOA – OSU Nitrogen
Fertilizer Optimization Alogrithm
|
Revenue computed with
wheat priced at $3.50/bu
|
Sensor CV at F5 = 12
and NDVI = 0.3
|
|
GreenSeekerTM vs
Conventional Treatments Orlando, OK 2004
|
Treatment
|
Preplant N Rate
|
Topdress
N Rate
|
Total N Applied
|
Wheat Yield
|
NUE
|
Gross Rev.
|
Add. Return
|
|
Lb/ac
|
Bu/ac
|
%
|
$/ac
|
Check
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
49.1
|
----
|
172.00
|
|
All N Pre
|
120
|
0
|
120
|
60.5
|
13
|
181.00
|
|
Var NFOA
|
0
|
13
|
13
|
54.3
|
57
|
186.00
|
|
Var. NFOA
|
45
|
10
|
55
|
61.8
|
33
|
202.00
|
21.00
|
Flat NFOA
|
0
|
20
|
20
|
52.4
|
26
|
178.00
|
|
Flat NFOA
|
45
|
13
|
13
|
62.7
|
33
|
205.00
|
24.00
|
NFOA – OSU Nitrogen
Fertilizer Optimization Alogrithm
|
Sensor CV at F5 = 22%
and Average NDVI = 0.5
|
Revenue computed with
wheat priced at $3.50/bu
|
|
|
Field Winter Demonstrations of VRT
Applicator
Covington, OK, Matt Steinert Farms (February 24, 2004)
Cherokee, OK, Kenneth Failes (February 26, 2004)
Redrock, OK, Martin Williams (March 3, 2004) |
Table 1. Grain yield response to N fertilizer
applications using various different resolutions, Tipton, OK, 2004.
Treatment Preplant N
Topdress N Method Yield Grain NUE, %
lb/ac
lb/ac bu/ac N uptake
________________________________________________________________________
1 0
0 - 50.5
71.2 -
2 90 0
- 69.8 98.4 30
3 0 90
- 70.3 99.1 31
4 0 30 NFOA
3x3 63.3 89.2 60
5 0 33 NFOA
6x12 63.5 89.5 55
6 0 31 NFOA 12x24
60.9 85.9 47
________________________________________________________________________
SED
2.8
CV from NDVI readings in the Check plots, Feekes 5: 17.2% (range:
13.6-24.2)
avg. NDVI at F5 sensing: 0.61
Table 2. Grain yield response to N fertilizer
applications using various different resolutions, Chickasha, OK 2004.
Treatment Preplant N Topdress N
Method Yield Grain NUE, %
lb/ac
lb/ac bu/ac N uptake
________________________________________________________________________
1 0 0
- 18.1 25.5 -
2 90 0
- 25.2 35.5 11
3 0 90
- 26.5 37.3 13
4 0 36 NFOA
3x3 24.2 34.1 24
5 0 45 NFOA
6x12 25.4 35.8 23
6 0 42 NFOA 12x24
26.0 36.7 27
________________________________________________________________________
SED
2.3
CV from NDVI readings in the Check plots, Feekes 5: 12.1% (range:
10.1-15.7)
avg. NDVI at F5 sensing: 0.28
|
Assumptions, Based upon Clyde COOP Website Aug 5, 2003, Cash prices |
GS = GreenSeeker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price of wheat, $/bu |
PPN cost, $/lb N |
TDN cost, $/lb N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
0.19 |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooperator |
Preplant N, lb/ac |
In-season N, lb/ac |
GS N, lb/ac |
Total applied N, lb/ac |
Yield, bu/ac |
Return, $/ac |
|
|
|
|
Apache Farmer |
82 |
34 |
0 |
116 |
42 |
108.22 |
|
|
|
|
Apache NRS |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
49 |
135.35 |
|
|
|
|
Apache GS |
0 |
0 |
37 |
37 |
46 |
135.65 |
|
|
|
|
Claybaker Farmer |
76 |
0 |
0 |
76 |
34 |
92.66 |
|
|
|
|
Claybaker NRS |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
47 |
129.05 |
|
|
|
|
Claybaker GS |
0 |
0 |
37 |
37 |
48 |
141.95 |
|
|
|
|
Ivan Peck Farmer |
81 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
42 |
116.91 |
|
Check |
48 |
151.2 |
Ivan Peck NRS |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
44 |
119.60 |
|
|
|
|
Ivan Peck GS |
0 |
0 |
38 |
38 |
52 |
154.30 |
|
|
|
|
Scheiber 0 GS |
0 |
0 |
35 |
35 |
32 |
92.05 |
|
|
|
|
Scheiber 50 Farmer |
109 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
44 |
117.89 |
|
Check |
25 |
78.75 |
Scheiber 50 NRS |
100 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
43 |
116.45 |
|
|
|
|
Scheiber 50 GS |
50 |
0 |
8 |
58 |
43 |
123.95 |
|
|
|
|
Steve Clark Farmer |
80 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
58 |
167.50 |
|
Check |
49 |
154.35 |
Steve Clark NRS |
160 |
0 |
0 |
160 |
64 |
171.20 |
|
|
|
|
Steve Clark GS |
20 |
0 |
38 |
58 |
58 |
169.40 |
|
|
|
|
Steinert_C Farmer |
74 |
0 |
0 |
74 |
54 |
156.04 |
|
|
|
|
Steinert_C NRS |
118 |
0 |
0 |
118 |
59 |
163.43 |
|
|
|
|
Steinert_C GS |
59 |
0 |
37 |
96 |
55 |
152.79 |
|
|
|
|
Steinert_P Farmer |
110 |
0 |
0 |
110 |
63 |
177.55 |
|
Check |
58 |
182.7 |
Steinert_P NRS |
183 |
0 |
0 |
183 |
63 |
163.68 |
|
|
|
|
Steinert_P GS |
60 |
0 |
23 |
83 |
63 |
181.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Data |
PPN, lb/ac |
TDN, lb/ac |
GSN, lb/ac |
Total applied N, lb/ac |
Yield, bu/ac |
Return, $/ac |
|
|
|
|
Average Farmer |
87.43 |
4.86 |
0.00 |
92.29 |
48.14 |
133.82 |
|
|
|
|
Average NRS |
123.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
123.00 |
52.71 |
142.68 |
|
|
|
|
Average GS |
19.86 |
0.00 |
35.00 |
54.86 |
50.57 |
146.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field Scale Variable Rate Trials, 2002 |
Average over 10 Locations |
Average over 10 sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIHARVEST =
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Early |
Late |
Total N |
Yield |
Net Revenue |
n= |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
Topdress N |
Topdress N |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
$/ac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
2XS |
62 |
32 |
0 |
94 |
44.6 |
116 |
81 |
VRT |
41 |
15 |
23 |
79 |
39.8 |
104 |
24 |
VS3 |
35 |
21 |
35 |
91 |
37.3 |
93 |
25 |
VS2 |
49 |
9 |
24 |
82 |
35.4 |
91 |
17 |
Farmer Check |
52 |
21 |
20 |
92 |
34.6 |
86 |
SED |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***10 loc's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
VRT |
41 |
15 |
23 |
79 |
39.8 |
104 |
17 |
Farmer Check |
52 |
21 |
20 |
92 |
34.6 |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***5 loc's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
VRT |
55 |
13 |
17 |
85 |
39.8 |
104 |
25 |
VS2 |
49 |
9 |
24 |
82 |
35.4 |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***5 loc's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
VRT |
43 |
24 |
24 |
91 |
39.2 |
99 |
23 |
VS3 |
35 |
21 |
35 |
91 |
37.9 |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***8 loc's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
VRT |
42 |
18 |
23 |
84 |
41.2 |
107 |
71 |
2XS |
62 |
32 |
0 |
94 |
44.7 |
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue = (grain yield * $3.00/bu) -
(preplant N applied * $0.15/lb N)-(topdress N applied * $0.25/lb N) |
SED = standard error of the difference between
two equally replicated means |
*** Means for only those sites where both
treatments were evaluated (not all treatments were evaluated at each site) |
By - Site Grain Yields |
Cherokee, OK, Kenneth Failes |
RI NDVI = 1.1 |
Harvest Date, June 4, 2002 |
CV = 16 |
|
|
RI Harvest = 1.24 |
Treatment |
Description |
Preplant N |
Topdress N |
Total N Rate |
Yield |
|
|
lb/ac |
lb/ac |
lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Flat NFOA |
30 |
25 |
55 |
34 |
2 |
2X Strip |
60 |
0 |
60 |
51 |
3 |
Flat NFOA |
30 |
23 |
53 |
37 |
4 |
VRT |
30 |
20 |
50 |
44 |
5 |
Check |
30 |
0 |
30 |
41 |
6 |
2X Strip |
60 |
0 |
60 |
42 |
7 |
75 Flat |
30 |
75 |
105 |
43 |
8 |
VRT |
30 |
20 |
50 |
30 |
|
Amorita, OK, Steve Clark |
|
RI NDVI = 1.46 |
Harvest Date: June 12, 2002 |
CV = 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RI Harvest = 1.36 |
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
Reps |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2X Strip |
92 |
0 |
92 |
57.4 |
1 |
Check |
46 |
0 |
46 |
42.2 |
2 |
Flat NFOA-45 |
46 |
45 |
91 |
44.7 |
3 |
VRT |
46 |
41 |
87 |
49.2 |
1 |
Flat NFOA-75 |
46 |
75 |
121 |
50.2 |
1 |
Farmer |
46 |
30 |
76 |
40.3 |
|
Earl Marshall, Hennessey |
RISV = 1.55 |
Harvest Date: June 18, 2002 |
CV = 20 |
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
Reps |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
VRT |
75 |
31 |
106 |
29.9 |
4 |
FLAT NFOA |
75 |
25 |
100 |
26.3 |
4 |
VRT |
75 |
35 |
110 |
28.2 |
4 |
FLAT NFOA |
75 |
28 |
103 |
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
RINDVI =
1.57 |
|
|
Matt Steinert - Emerson |
RIHARVEST=1.1 |
Harvest Date: June 19, 2002 |
CV = 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
Reps |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
Jan 12 |
April 3 |
|
|
4 |
2X Strip |
10 |
100 |
0 |
110 |
29 |
4 |
Check |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
26 |
4 |
Flat NFOA |
10 |
50 |
37 |
97 |
37 |
4 |
75 Flat |
10 |
50 |
62 |
122 |
38 |
4 |
VRT |
10 |
50 |
38 |
98 |
38 |
4 |
Flat NFOA |
10 |
50 |
34 |
94 |
36 |
4 |
VRT |
10 |
50 |
45 |
105 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of Flat NFOA |
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
Average of VRT |
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RINDVI =
1.27 |
|
|
Matt Steinert - Peters |
|
RIHARVEST=1.34 |
Harvest Date: June 19, 2002 |
CV=18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
Reps |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
Jan 12 |
April 3 |
|
|
4 |
2X Strip |
10 |
100 |
0 |
110 |
44.8 |
4 |
Check |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
33.3 |
4 |
Check |
10 |
50 |
|
60 |
34.2 |
4 |
Flat NFOA |
10 |
0 |
21 |
31 |
34.6 |
4 |
Flat NFOA |
10 |
50 |
57 |
117 |
44 |
4 |
VRT |
10 |
50 |
14 |
74 |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RINDVI =
1.43 |
|
|
Matt Steinert - Beopple |
|
RIHARVEST=1.24 |
Harvest Date: June 20, 2002 |
CV = 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
Reps |
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
Jan 12 |
March 28 |
|
|
4 |
2X Strip + VRT |
10 |
60 |
39 |
109 |
47.8 |
4 |
2X Strip |
10 |
60 |
0 |
70 |
53.5 |
4 |
4X Strip + VRT |
10 |
120 |
0 |
130 |
46.8 |
4 |
4X Strip + VRT |
10 |
120 |
43 |
173 |
47.6 |
4 |
Check |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
43.2 |
4 |
Check + VRT |
10 |
0 |
31 |
41 |
49.4 |
4 |
Flat NFOA 63 |
10 |
30 |
23 |
63 |
48.1 |
4 |
Flat NFOA 91 |
10 |
30 |
51 |
91 |
48.7 |
4 |
VRT 72 |
10 |
30 |
32 |
72 |
46.9 |
Stan Claybaker |
|
RINDVI = 1.1 |
Harvest Date: June 24, 2002 |
|
|
|
RIHARVEST = 1.1 |
|
|
CV = 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
|
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
11-Apr-02 |
|
|
4 |
VRT |
56 |
10 |
66 |
43.3 |
4 |
VRT |
56 |
10 |
66 |
42.3 |
4 |
VS1 |
56 |
9 |
65 |
40.7 |
4 |
VRT |
56 |
11 |
67 |
41.9 |
4 |
VS2 |
56 |
23 |
79 |
40.5 |
4 |
VS5 |
56 |
54 |
110 |
42 |
4 |
2XStrip |
106 |
0 |
106 |
44.2 |
4 |
2XStrip+VS5 |
106 |
55 |
161 |
44.2 |
Tom Cannon |
|
|
RINDVI =
1.33 |
Harvest Date: June 24, 2002 |
|
|
|
RIHARVEST =
1.1 |
|
CV = 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
|
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
11-Apr-02 |
|
|
4 |
OPTICROP |
15 |
60, 40 |
115 |
39.1 |
4 |
Check |
45 |
0 |
45 |
36.8 |
4 |
VRT |
45 |
43 |
88 |
37.5 |
4 |
VS3 |
45 |
31 |
76 |
37.5 |
4 |
VRT |
45 |
35 |
80 |
38.9 |
4 |
VS3 |
45 |
30 |
75 |
38.8 |
4 |
2XS VRT |
85 |
40 |
125 |
38.8 |
4 |
2XS |
85 |
0 |
85 |
38.3 |
Otto Matusek |
|
|
RINDVI = 1.1 |
Harvest Date: June 25, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
RIHARVEST =
1.3 |
|
CV=47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
|
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
10-Dec-02 |
3-Apr-02 |
|
|
4 |
2XS |
150 |
28 |
0 |
178 |
48.64 |
4 |
VS3 |
75 |
28 |
36 |
139 |
39.8 |
4 |
VRT RI 1.5 |
75 |
28 |
13 |
116 |
44.5 |
4 |
VS1 |
75 |
28 |
11 |
114 |
37.2 |
4 |
VRT RI 1.1 |
75 |
28 |
3 |
106 |
39.1 |
4 |
VS2 |
75 |
28 |
25 |
128 |
40.2 |
4 |
VRT RI 1.3 |
75 |
28 |
11 |
114 |
40.7 |
4 |
VRT RI 1.1 |
75 |
28 |
4 |
107 |
38.8 |
4 |
VRT RI 1.3 |
75 |
28 |
8 |
111 |
40.7 |
4 |
VS1 |
75 |
28 |
12 |
115 |
36.7 |
4 |
check |
75 |
28 |
0 |
103 |
37.1 |
Efaw Exp. Station |
|
RINDVI =
1.65 |
Harvest Date: June 26, 2002 |
|
|
|
RIHARVEST =
1.27 |
|
CV = 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preplant |
Topdress |
Total N |
Yield |
|
Treatment |
N rate, lb/ac |
N rate, lb/ac |
rate, lb/ac |
bu/ac |
|
|
|
27-Mar-02 |
|
|
6 |
VRT |
0 |
21 |
21 |
31.7 |
2 |
VS3 |
0 |
44 |
44 |
31.7 |
4 |
VS5 |
0 |
62 |
62 |
31.1 |
4 |
check |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|